Process for Submitting Applications

The research enterprise can be characterized by a “cradle to grave” process. This process begins with a concept or idea that is turned into a proposal, followed by an award, the performance of the project, and several other steps that ultimately lead to the closeout process.

Work Flow – Proposal to Closeout

osp_workflow

The Office of Sponsored Programs (OSP) is the central administrative office responsible for submitting proposals and accepting awards on behalf of the MBL.  Sponsored project proposals may only be submitted, and awards accepted, by individuals authorized in OSP to sign the necessary documents.  Because proposals are submitted, and awards are granted to the MBL and not to individual PI’s, PI’s and administrative staff are not authorized to submit proposals, accept grants, or execute contracts on behalf of the MBL.

The Principle Investigator (PI) has the overall responsibility for the technical and fiscal management of a sponsored project, including the management of the project within funding limitations.  While responsibility for the day to day management of project finances may be delegated to administrative or other staff, accountability for compliance with MBL policy and sponsor requirements ultimately rests with the PI.

Proposal Preparation

1. START EARLY!

2. Find funding opportunity

3. Notify your Center Administrator that you plan to submit a proposal.

4. Download the Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA), also known as a Request for Application (RFA), Request for Proposal (RFP), Program solicitation or Program Announcement.

5. Review Funding Opportunity Announcement for:

6. Notify Center Administrator if you think you need to be registered in an electronic system for proposal preparation.  Your Center Administrator will notify and work with OSP for proposal set-up and submission.

7. Develop your timeline for submission (setting your final due date at least 10 business days prior to the agency deadline is suggested).

8. Develop a budget and budget justification and review with your Center Administrator.

9. Complete a Proposal Summary Form, sign and obtain signature of approval from Center Director.

10. AT LEAST 10 business days prior to Sponsor deadline,  submit the following to the Office of Sponsored Programs. Please be sure to use our MBL Grant Information Sheet for the most current rates, contact info, assurance and DUNS numbers, etc.

  • Budget
  • Budget Justification
  • Proposal Summary Form
  • Brief Project Summary or Work Scope

11. The Office of Sponsored Programs will review material submitted in #10 above and may require changes prior to submission of final application.  An OSP Grants Coordinator will work with the Center Administrator and PI to review the submitted materials to ensure compliance with sponsor requirements.

12. AT LEAST 5 business days prior to Sponsor deadline, submit completed application to the Office of Sponsored Programs.

Click below for Sponsor-Specific Checklists to assist with proposal preparation (checklists are developed based on current agency-specific proposal submission guidelines:

collage_osp

 

What is Cost Sharing?

Cost sharing (matching funds) is any portion of a project or program that is the responsibility of the MBL and not reimbursed by the sponsor. In a proposal or an award, cost sharing represents a commitment by the Institute.

Types of Cost Sharing

  • Mandatory – The sponsor requires cost sharing as a condition of the award.
  • Voluntary – The sponsor does not require cost sharing as a condition of the award.

 

Cost Sharing Requirements

All cost sharing must be approved in advance prior to submission of a proposal. The usual policy at the MBL is to only approve cost sharing when it is specifically required by the sponsor (mandatory) and only to the level required by the agency. Volunteered cost sharing is discouraged as this has the potential to become an unnecessary financial burden on the MBL. The proposed cost sharing must be approved by the Manager of Sponsored Programs, the Grants Specialist and, if MBL funds are to be used, by the Chief Financial Officer or the Controller. The cost sharing will be accounted for in a separate cost center associated with the prime award. All cost sharing including “in kind” cost sharing must be documented and accounted for.

 

Facilities and Administrative Costs (F&A)

Research institutions are eligible for reimbursement of Facilities and Administrative costs (aka F&A or Indirect) related to federal and private grants and contracts. The Federal guidelines referenced for administration of federal awards can be found under The Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB’s) Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards:

Two components comprise the total cost of a research project: (1) direct costs and (2) facilities and administrative (F&A) or indirect costs.

  • Direct Costs include those that can be identified specifically with a particular sponsored project or those that can be directly assigned to a particular project with a high degree of accuracy.
  • F&A Costs are those costs that are incurred for common or joint objectives and therefore cannot be identified readily and specifically with a particular sponsored project.

F&A costs are applied on a Modified Total Direct Cost base (MTDC). The non-F&A-bearing costs in the budget must be identified so that project F&A can be accurately calculated. The MTDC base excludes:

  • Equipment or Capital expenses valued at $5,000 or greater
  • Subaward expenditures in excess of $25,000
  • Participant Support Costs

The MBL annually negotiates its F&A rate with the Department of Health and Human Services its cognizant federal audit agency. 2017 MBL Negotiated Rate DHHS Agreement

 

Cost Allowability Grant & Contract Administration

Consideration/clarification of common misconceptions

  • Just because something is in the budget doesn’t mean the awarding agency allows or approves of the cost. The awarding agency relies on the recipient institution’s internal control system to ensure the costs conform to the applicable cost principles.
  • Cost principles do not represent what the federal government will pay for, but rather what may be paid for…interpretation is subjective.

Tests of Allowability

    1. Costs must be reasonable. Is the nature of the goods or services and the amount reflective of the action that a prudent person would have taken under the prevailing circumstances?
    2. Costs must be allocable. Will the cost advance the work? Is the cost beneficial and necessary to the work under the sponsored agreement?
    3. Costs must be treated consistently. Costs incurred for the same purpose, in like circumstances must be treated as either direct or indirect, consistently with respect to the final cost objective.

Costs must be allowable per the appropriate cost principles and the sponsored agreement. Cost principles applicable to non-for profit agencies is 2 CFR, Part 230; see Link

Unallowable Costs

      • Alcoholic Beverages
      • Contributions
      • Entertainment Costs
      • Goods or Services for Personal Use
      • Lobbying

Caution Costs (contingent upon circumstance)

    • Memberships & Subscriptions
    • Travel on a Foreign Air Carrier
    • General Purpose Items